Skip to Content
2026-27 QUALITY COUNCIL AUDIT

Share feedback about your experiences with QA processes here.

2026-27 Quality Council Audit Feedback Survey

As part of its regular eight-year audit cycle, the Quality Council will audit the University of Toronto’s compliance with the University of Toronto Quality Assurance Process (UTQAP) in 2026–27 – U of T’s second audit since the UTQAP was implemented in 2011–12. All publicly assisted universities in Ontario associated with the Quality Council have committed to participating in this audit process. 

The UTQAP governs the University’s quality assurance activities, which include the approval of new academic programs, cyclical reviews of existing undergraduate and graduate programs, the assessment of major and minor modifications to existing programs, and closures of existing degrees and programs. These processes are designed to ensure that academic programs offered by the University meet the highest standards of quality and align with the Quality Assurance Framework (QAF) for the Province of Ontario.   

The audit examines whether the University has acted in compliance with its quality assurance policies and contributes to a culture of continuous improvement in academic programming. The auditors’ site visit is scheduled for early 2027, and this is your opportunity to share feedback about your experiences with the University’s quality assurance processes. Your input helps ensure that the voices of faculty, staff, and students are reflected in the audit process and informs how the University continues to strengthen and improve its approach to quality assurance. We welcome your questions and comments below. 

"*" indicates required fields

Feedback on the University's QA process

Please indicate your level of agreement with each of the following statements: (Strongly agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree / Strongly disagree)
1. The University's quality assurance processes are clear and easy to navigate.
2. The quality assurance processes support the continuous improvement of academic programs.
3. The quality assurance processes are manageable and not overly burdensome.
4. The support provided by the Office of the Vice-Provost, Academic Programs has been helpful throughout the process.
5. Overall, I am satisfied with the University's approach to quality assurance.

Please note: Responses to this form are collected by the University of Toronto’s Office of the Vice-Provost, Academic Programs for the purpose of informing the 2026–27 Quality Council Audit. If provided, your name and email will not be shared with external auditors.