TEST
UTQAP Protocol for Standard Approval of New Programs
option 1: table
Development | External Appraisal | Governance | Oversight |
---|---|---|---|
Program outline brought forward by the Dean | |||
Consultation coordinated by the VPAP Office Meeting date: |
|||
Proposal development (graduate or undergraduate) by the unit/division. First draft to VPAP: Second draft to VPAP: |
Appraiser nominations recommended by the Dean’s Office.
Approval of nominated appraisers by the Provost’s Office. |
||
Broad consultation | |||
PAG meeting date: | |||
Decanal and Provostial signoff | |||
Invitation to appraisers | |||
Date of site visit by appraisers: | |||
Appraisal report | |||
Internal responses | |||
Faculty/divisional governance approval date: | |||
AP&P approval date:* | |||
Academic Board approval date:* | |||
Executive Committee confirmation date:* | |||
VPAP Office submission date to Quality Council:
Approval to commence |
University submission date to MCU for approval: | ||
* Specific governance pathway depends on type of program.
option 2: PDF and image
Below: click to enlarge the image.